I TOOK A SURVEY AND WOULD B..

IT'S TRUE, HALF OF AMERICAN FOLKS ARE JEWISH!!! I COULDN'T BELIEVE IT. I DID THIS AT MY JOB IN A FACTORY OF OVER 1200 EMPLOYEES. WHO WOULD DO THIS TO A CHILD?? I'M NOT CUT AND THANK YOU GOD IN HEAVEN. I'VE HEARD BECAUSE IT CUTS DOWN ON DISEASE, THAT'S A CROCK, IF YOUR FATHER SHOWS YOU HOW TO CLEAN PROPERLY AS A CHILD...... ALSO MEN ARE MORE SENSITIVE WITH IT NOT BEING CUT, AND DON'T HAVE TO USE CREAMS AND JELLS.... I THINK IT'S SEXIER TOO...... WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THIS EXTRA SKIN??????????????????????

Wow, on the one hand you are kind of right, on the other hand, you are wrong.

If you are in the U.S., all of those men who are circumcised are not done because they are Jewish. It is because it is the custom of people here in the U.S. to mulilate their little infant boys. It started a long time ago in Victorian times in England and the U.S. Once they realized that it was not necessary and did not cause the diseases they thought it would, England dropped the practice like a hot potato, but the U.S. continues. A circumcised penis is rare in European countries. As a matter of fact, the main people in the world who circumcise their boys are the Jewish, the Muslim, (for religious reasons) and the U.S. Only 20% of the world's men are circumcised, and 18% of those men are from the U.S.

Why? Because here in the U.S., they use infant foreskins for burn treatment, and beauty products. Routine "medical" circumcision makes the doctors a lot of $$$$, because they charge to do it, then they sell the foreskins. And since it's been done so long, a lot of doctors don't know the proper care of an intact baby boy, (i.e., LEAVING IT ALONE!) and advise parents to clean and scrub under it, which causes it to get infected (I mean, just the same way it would hurt a girls privates to do this, it hurst a boys) which may lead to a then "necessary" circumcision a little later down the road.